An Objective Article

I found an article from the New York Times about juvenile crime. The article discussed how many states have raised the age of adulthood in criminal matters. By years end, New York may be the only state where the age of adult criminal responsibility is 16.

i thought the article was fair and objective. They gave reasons supporting both an older and a younger age cutoff. Prosecution in juvenile courts is more expensive, and because states are facing budget deficits, many are opposed to the recent changes in raising the age. Also, would the juvenile courts have the means to cope with another two age groups? On the other hand, it was mentioned in the article that the juvenile justice system is better able to rehabilitate young offenders due to the greater availability of social services.

In my opinion, 18 is a good age. It would cost more, but because the juvenile system focuses more on treatment and rehabilitation, it would be more beneficial. Also, Juvenile court records are sealed. This means that people who stay out of trouble as adults would have an easier time finding jobs.